Considering cautious responses

I realize I should provide a careful response since I haven't seen reliable reports, and I'm aware of my knowledge cutoff. Since I can browse, I can help check current credible sources or draft a neutral piece instead. But I want to avoid browsing unless requested by the user.

I could offer options like:
I need to be careful not to assert that the rumors are true. I should use conditional language, saying there are online rumors, but no confirmation yet. It’s important to provide guidance on how to verify information, like checking official statements, program producers, verified media, and police or hospital records.
I'll also mention specifics regarding the two Chinese celebrities involved but won’t use their names directly. I’ll craft a concise response in Chinese and ask for the user’s preference on verification.

I can offer a neutral news brief template and tips for verifying claims, urging caution about unverified information and emphasizing the need for reliable sources.
这是网传说法,暂无法确认真伪。你希望我做哪件事?
先给你一个稳妥的通稿范例(可直接用):

核验要点(供你自查):

需要我现在就检索并回报可信来源吗?